How Has Family Makeup Up Changed

The Impact of Family Structure and Family change on Kid Outcomes: A Personal Reading of the Research Literature

Ross Mackay
Ministry of Social Development

Abstract

The paper provides a brief overview of the research literature on the impacts of family construction and family unit modify on child outcomes, with a particular focus on parental separation. It takes as a starting betoken the beingness of pervasive associations between family alter and child outcomes and addresses a range of issues that are examined in the research literature. Do family changes primarily have brusque-term impacts on children, or practise they as well have more enduring impacts? How does remarriage affect child outcomes? What touch do frequent changes of family structure have on child outcomes? What are the mechanisms that link family unit structure and family change to child outcomes? How much of the impact is attributable to income changes consequent on parental separation? How much is owing to the absence of a parent figure? How much is attributable to poorer mental health of lone parents following a parental separation? How much is attributable to the disharmonize between parents which frequently accompanies a parental separation? And how much of the association between family modify and kid outcomes is due to non-causal mechanisms, such every bit option effects? The newspaper will sketch out answers to these questions, as far as these tin can be determined from the published results of enquiry.

Introduction

Over the past two decades or so, a significant literature has developed on the impact of family structure and family unit change on kid wellbeing. This literature documents an accumulating body of bear witness that children raised in different family contexts display differential patterns of outcomes beyond a wide range of developmental domains. In particular, children raised in lone-parent families have been found, on average, to exercise less well across a range of measures of wellbeing than their peers in ii-parent families, while parental separation has been institute to be associated with an assortment of agin outcomes for children. Behind these patterns of associations between family contexts and child outcomes, however, lies a complex web of overlapping and interacting influences, which means that interpreting these results is far from straightforward. It is the aim of this newspaper to throw some low-cal on the reasons why kid outcomes are contingent on family contexts.

The paper provides a brief overview of the research literature in this field. For reasons of space, the paper focuses rather narrowly on the impact of parental separation on child outcomes, although it besides briefly examines the impact of remarriage and multiple family unit transitions on child wellbeing. Inside this constrained purview, however, the paper examines a range of bug that are canvassed in the inquiry literature. Information technology takes equally a starting point the existence of pervasive associations between family change and child outcomes and considers a range of questions that follow from this: Do family changes such as parental separation primarily have short-term impacts on children, or practise they likewise take more enduring impacts? How does remarriage impact child outcomes? What impacts do frequent changes of family structure accept on child outcomes? What are the mechanisms that link family unit structure and family modify to child outcomes? Are there causal connections between family unit change and child outcomes or are at that place other reasons for these associations? The paper likewise examines an exemplar intervention that has been shown to ameliorate the agin impacts of family change on children'south wellbeing.

The literature on these questions is big, complex and growing so fast that it is no longer possible even to keep abreast of new papers produced each yr, allow alone master everything that has been published in the past two decades. This poses a challenge for a brief survey of the literature such as this. It needs to be said that this paper is non based on a systematic review of the literature in this field. Although I accept tried to read widely and without bias, the portion of the literature I take been able to read is necessarily selective – and the portion I can reference in this paper is much more constrained – while the very act of selection has, no doubt, been shaped past my ain views and interests. The paper should thus be regarded as no more than a personal reading of the literature.

Parental Separation and Child Outcomes

Parental separation has been reported in the literature every bit beingness associated with a wide range of adverse effects on children'south wellbeing, both every bit a short-term upshot of the transition and in the class of more indelible effects that persist into adulthood. Effects reported include adverse impacts on cerebral capacity (Fergusson, Lynskey and Horwood 1994), schooling (Evans et al. 2001), physical health (Dawson 1991), mental and emotional wellness (Chase-Lansdale et al. 1995), social comport and behaviour (Morrison and Coiro 1999), peer relations (Demo and Acock 1988), criminal offending (Hanson 1999), cigarette smoking (Ermisch and Francesconi 2001), substance apply (Fergusson, Horwood and Lynskey 1994), early departure from home (Mitchell et al. 1989), early-onset sexual behaviour (Ellis et al. 2003) and teenage pregnancy (Woodward et al. 2001).

A further range of impacts in early adulthood and beyond include higher rates of early childbearing (McLanahan and Bumpass 1994), early marriage (Keith and Finlay 1988), marital dissolution (Amato and DeBoer 2001), lone parenthood (McLanahan and Booth 1989), low occupational status (Biblarz and Gottainer 2000), economic hardship (McLanahan and Berth 1989), poor-quality relationships with parents (Aquilino 1994), unhappiness (Biblarz and Gottainer 2000), discontentment with life (Furstenberg and Teitler 1994), mistrust in others (Ross and Mirowsky 1999), and reduced longevity (Tucker et al. 1997).

On the face of information technology, this seems like a long and forlorn list, which suggests that parental separation bears down heavily on children and blights their lives to a pregnant degree beyond all domains of functioning. Yet the picture is not as dour every bit this litany of problems might suggest. In most cases the size of the reported effects is pocket-sized; a minority of children are negatively affected, mostly but in the presence of other exacerbating factors; and in many cases the beingness of a causal connection is contested and other competing explanations for these associations have been put forrard. In other words, it is important to be cautious in interpreting the meaning of these patterns of association.

Many scholars who accept identified associations betwixt family unit structure and family unit change and kid outcomes have drawn attending to the relatively small size of the effects. Joshi et al. (1999) describe the effect sizes they measured as "modest", while Burns et al. (1997) refer to effects that were "very weak". Allison and Furstenberg (1989) report that the proportion of variation in outcome measures that could exist attributed to marital dissolution was generally small, never amounting to more than than 3%.

The pocket-size nature of the associations between separation and children's outcomes means that knowing that a child comes from a separated family unit, and knowing nothing else about the kid, has lilliputian predictive ability in terms of the kid's wellbeing. There is a wide diversity of outcomes among both groups of children from divorced and intact families, and the adjustment of children following divorce depends on a wide range of other factors.

Demo and Acock (1996) note that "the differences in adolescent well-being within family types are greater than the differences across family types, suggesting that family processes are more of import than family composition". Indeed, O'Connor et al. (2001) showed that differences in adjustment between children within the same family are as great as, and fifty-fifty slightly greater than, differences betwixt children in different families. Demo and Acock (1996) note further that measures of family unit relations explained the largest proportion of variance in boyish wellbeing.

The bulk of children whose parents have divorced function within normal or boilerplate limits in the years after divorce (Kelly 1993). As a grouping, they can not be characterised equally "disturbed". Furthermore, in that location is a considerable range of operation within both groups of children from divorced and intact families. Among children whose parents have divorced are many who are functioning quite well, while among children from intact families are many with major adjustment issues. In brusque, there is no one-to-1 relationship between divorce and psychological adjustment problems in children.

In fact, non only do some children do well despite the divorce of their parents, just some children actually benefit from the divorce. Demo and Acock 1988 annotation that adolescents living in single-parent families tin "acquire certain strengths, notably a sense of responsibility, as a consequence of contradistinct family routines". It is likely, withal, that such benefits will accrue but where the altered routines are structured and predictable. Changes that involve the emergence of more than chaotic patterns of family life are unlikely to be benign for children, even if some strive to furnish a sense of society where their parents fail to practise so. Butler et al. (2002) notation that the children in their study demonstrated "an active function helping their parents cope with divorce, even in circumstances where parents did not seem able to contain their more negative emotions and impulses".

Children also do good where a parental separation provides release from an aversive family situation; for case, where the parental relationship is highly conflicted and the children are drawn into the disharmonize (Booth and Amato 2001, Jekielek 1998) or where the kid's human relationship with a parent effigy is of poor quality (Videon 2002). Videon (2002) notes that:

The prophylactic furnishings of parental separation are amplified as adolescents' satisfaction with the parent–adolescent relationship decreases. When adolescents are residentially separated from an unsatisfying same-sex parent relationship … their level of delinquent behaviour is lower than adolescents who continue to reside with a same-sex parent with whom they have a poor relationship.

A further circumstance where children may benefit from a parental separation is where a parent exhibits antisocial behaviour. Jaffee et al. (2003) institute that the less time fathers lived with their children, the more conduct problems the children had, but only if the fathers exhibit low levels of antisocial behaviour. In dissimilarity, when fathers showroom high levels of antisocial behaviour, the longer they lived with their children the more than conduct problems the children exhibited. In such cases, children are probable to be receiving a double whammy of genetic and environmental factors that heighten the risk of conduct bug.

However, despite all these caveats and qualifications, information technology remains true that children whose parents separate do less well, on average, across a range of measures of wellbeing. A pressing question that follows from this is why these associations arise. Before examining this question, I will consider briefly whether remarriage changes the outlook for children who have experienced a parental separation, what impact multiple family unit transitions have on child wellbeing and whether the effects of parental separation are primarily short-term or whether it also has more persistent and enduring consequences for children's wellbeing.

Remarriage and Child Outcomes

Remarriage does not generally improve outcomes for children, despite the potential gains from both improved economic circumstances and the presence of an additional developed to assist with parenting tasks. Indeed, some studies have shown children to be worse off afterwards a parent's remarriage. Elliott and Richards (1991) found that having a stepfather¹ had a deleterious effect on children's behaviour scores. Fergusson et al. (1986) plant that, among children who had experienced a parental separation, those whose parents reconciled or whose female parent remarried exhibited more behavioural difficulties than children who remained in a single-parent family unit. Baydar (1988) found that, although divorce was not negatively related to mothers' reports of children'due south behavioural and emotional bug, remarriage was.

Information technology appears, then, that there is something about the complexity of family life in stepfamilies that hinders them from benefiting from the additional resources that are available when a lonely mother remarries. Relationships within stepfamilies are complex and need fourth dimension and goodwill on all sides to piece of work well. Unlike the relationship between mother and stepfather, that between stepfather and stepchild is not a human relationship of choice, which means that goodwill may sometimes exist in short supply, at least in the early stages of establishing a stepfamily. Children are frequently suspicious of their mothers' new partners and slow to open up to the benefits the new relationship might confer on them, while stepfathers are often uncertain nearly how to respond to the children of their new partner (Amato 1987). Typically, this uncertainty results in lower levels of involvement: as Fine et al. (1993) note, stepfathers appear to actively refrain from becoming involved with their stepchildren, engaging in both fewer positive and fewer negative behaviours. Perhaps as a issue, cohesion remains lower among stepfamilies than among intact families (Pryor & Rodgers 2001). Even and then, improvements in stepfamily functioning are evident over time (Amato 1987), which suggests that many families manage to master the challenges they confront.

Multiple Family unit Transitions

Several studies have found that multiple family transitions are specially damaging for children. Dunn et al. (1998) reported that the number of transitions impacted both on children's adjustment problems and on levels of prosocial behaviour. Kurdek et al. (1994) found that, although the effects of the number of parenting transitions were significant, these accounted for a relatively small percent of the variation of adjustment, ranging betwixt 5% and eight% across three separate samples.

Aquilino (1996) reported that the experience of multiple transitions and multiple family unit types, among a sample of children not born into an intact biological family, was associated with lower educational attainment and greatly increased the likelihood that children would try to establish an contained household and enter the labour force at an early historic period.

One possible explanation is that having multiple transitions presents children with a succession of caregivers … and this experience may weaken children's attachment to any particular caregiver, making early autonomy seem more attractive. Similarly, having a variety of caregiving arrangements and multiple separations from caregivers may weaken both parents' and children's sense of mutual obligation and thus reduce the exchange of support across generations.

The evidence on this, still, is not entirely consistent. A range of other studies failed to turn upward any evidence that multiple transitions are more damaging to children's wellbeing (Berth and Amato 2001, Carlson and Corcoran 2001, Teachman 2002). It may exist that the impact of multiple transitions depends to some extent on the circumstances associated with transitions. Where transitions are well managed and conducted with goodwill, they may practice little harm, while transitions that are chaotic, unpredictable and infused with rancour and disputation may have malign effects on children's wellbeing.

Short-Term and Long-Term Impacts

Many of the reported effects of parental separation on child wellbeing are based on observations that are taken in the curt term. However, other studies accept examined effects over longer-term durations, some into adulthood. While there is evidence that many of the difficulties that children encounter every bit a result of parental separation refuse every bit time passes, there is also evidence that some effects are persistent and enduring.

Chase-Lansdale and Hetherington (1990) found that during the first ii years after a divorce both children and adults experienced pragmatic, physical and emotional issues also every bit declines in family functioning. By two years after the divorce the majority of families had fabricated pregnant adjustments, although among children there were variations by age and gender. While girls seemed to recover fully during the main schoolhouse years, boys in female parent-custody homes exhibited behaviour problems for as long as six years.

Nevertheless, Chase-Lansdale et al. (1995) found that parental divorce had negative consequences for the mental health of some offspring that persisted into adulthood. Parental divorce was associated with a moderate increase in the average score on a mensurate of mental health (indicating deterioration) and a 39% increment in the risk of psychopathology. Despite this meaning effect, it is of import to note that only a minority of people were at such risk: 82% of women and 94% of men whose parents divorced were predicted to fall below the clinical cut-off for psychopathology.

Amato and Keith (1991), in a meta-assay of studies that examined long-term consequences of parental divorce, reported adverse impacts on a range of domains of adult wellbeing, including psychological adjustment, use of mental wellness services, behaviour and conduct, educational attainment, material quality of life and divorce.

The last effect implies that the chance of a failed union is transmitted intergenerationally, a finding that is supported past other studies (Mueller and Pope 1977, Amato and DeBoer 2001, Teachman 2002). Amato and DeBoer (2001) found that parental divorce approximately doubled the odds that children's own marriages would stop in divorce. These increased odds appear to be the end result of a longer chain of effects. Children whose parents separated have been establish to be more likely to engage in early on-onset sexual activeness, to get out home at an early on historic period, to enter into an intimate partnership at an before age and to become parents at an early age. Early on entry into marriage is known to heighten the risk of separation and divorce. In improver, Mueller and Pope (1977) hypothesised that these effects ascend in role because youthful marriages involve less socially and emotionally mature individuals, are subject to greater economic hardship and receive less social support, both normatively from wider social club and from family and kin.

Even though the majority of children of divorced families are functioning within normal ranges or better on a diversity of objective measures of adjustment, Kelly (2003) notes that divorce can create lingering feelings of sadness, longing, worry and regret. Perhaps every bit many as half of immature adults recall distress and painful memories and experiences acquired past their parents' behaviours and post-divorce custody arrangements. Even if many children do not experience mental health disorders according to a clinical diagnosis, there is no doubt that for most information technology causes hurting and sadness in their lives.

Wallerstein and Corbin (1989) draw attention to the menstruum of tardily adolescence every bit a time when delayed responses to an earlier parental divorce emerge in young women, giving rise to anxieties in the domain of their relationships with young men. They also indicate to adolescence every bit a menstruation when immature women are more sensitive to the relationship between their parents:

It is the human relationship between the parents, after all, that forms the template for heterosexual relationships and provides the immature woman with a footing for her own hopes and expectations … Thus, information technology may not suffice for divorced parents to refrain from angry fighting. Information technology may be as of import to their daughters for parents to treat each other fairly and with continued kindness.

Mechanisms That Link Parental Separation to Child Outcomes

A range of mechanisms has been postulated to explain the link betwixt parental separation and adverse kid outcomes. Five mechanisms volition be considered in the following word:

income changes consistent on parental separation
paternal absenteeism
poor maternal mental health following a separation
interparental conflict
compromised parenting practices and child-parent relations.

Each of these mechanisms implies a causal connection between associations between parental separation and adverse child outcomes. A range of alternative explanations for the associations that exercise not involve causal connections has also been proposed. These not-causal explanations are examined in the following section.

Income Changes Consequent to Parental Separation

The economic circumstances of families decline later on divorce, specially among mother-headed families. Amato (1993) outlined a range of ways in which the economical position of a family might exert furnishings on child wellbeing:

Financial hardship may negatively affect children'south nutrition and health; it reduces parental investment in books, educational toys, computers, private lessons; it constrains option of residential location, which ways that the family unit may have to live in a neighbourhood where school programmes are poorly financed, services are inadequate and crime rates are high; children are more likely in such neighbourhoods to associate with delinquent peers.

Also every bit having a direct impact on child outcomes, economic factors are too likely to take impacts through indirect pathways. The stress associated with economic hardship can have negative impacts on parental mental health, which in turn can have consequences for children'southward wellbeing.

A number of studies have establish that when controls for income are applied, the effects of parental separation decline significantly (Carlson and Corcoran 2001) or fifty-fifty vanish entirely (due east.g. Blum et al. 1988), which implies that post-separation economic circumstances account for much of the deficit in wellbeing among children in separated families. Still, other studies show that the mail-separation economic state of affairs of families is non fully responsible for adverse outcomes among children and, moreover, that this has varying impacts on dissimilar outcomes. Wu (1996) establish that the impact of a alter in family construction on the probability of a premarital birth was largely unaffected when controls for income measures were practical, and noted that this suggested that family instability and income take largely independent effects on the probability that a young woman would bear her first child outside spousal relationship.

Hetherington et al. (1998) also found only modest back up for the economic deprivation hypothesis. They cite a number of studies that plant that even when income is controlled, children in divorced families exhibit more problems than do children in non-divorced families. They too annotation that although the income in stepfamilies is only slightly lower than that in non-divorced families, children in these families evidence a similar level of problem behaviour to that in divorced female parent-custody families. They conclude that the effects of income practise not seem to be primary and are largely indirect.

Overall, information technology might be concluded that declines in economic circumstances following separation may explain part, but past no ways all, of the poorer outcomes among children who accept experienced a parental separation.

Paternal Absence

Following a parental separation, most children alive in the primary custody of one parent, although joint custody arrangements accept become increasingly common over contempo years. In near cases, the custodial parent is the female parent, which means that a significant aspect of the experience of mail service-separation family unit life, for most children, is the absence of their father. Although other custody arrangements are increasingly common, the inquiry in this surface area has still tended to focus on "father absence".

At that place are a range of a priori reasons to hypothesise that the absence of the father from the home might have a negative touch on children's wellbeing. As Amato (1993) notes, the absence of one parent means a deficit in terms of parental time available to do the work of parenting (and all the other work in the household, which farther restricts the available fourth dimension for parenting). Children will also lack exposure both to an adult male role model and to the skills and processes involved in a committed developed relationship, including such things as communication, negotiation, compromise and expression of intimacy (although it must be said that many couples in intact relationships model such things imperfectly at least part of the time). In add-on, children are likely to suffer where the absenteeism of their father from the dwelling means that they take lost effective contact with him.

Despite these hypothetical grounds for expecting a "begetter absence" effect, research studies have generally failed to observe evidence to show that this plays a potent role in explaining the differential outcomes experienced by children from divorced and intact families. Two pieces of testify, in detail, weigh against it.

Outset, children whose parents separated do worse than children who take experienced a parental bereavement. Biblarz and Gottainer (2000) found that, compared with children of widowed mothers, children of divorced mothers had significantly lower levels of education, occupational status and happiness in adulthood. They found no evidence that divorced mothers were less competent parents than widowed mothers and speculated that the contrasting positions in the social construction of dissimilar types of single-mother families may account for observed differences in child outcomes. In particular, they notation that widows occupied an advantaged position in the social construction, in terms of employment, financial position and occupational status, compared with divorced mothers. This suggests that the absence of the begetter, if information technology has an issue, has a much weaker event than that of these economic factors.

Secondly, equally has already been noted, remarriage does non by and large meliorate the wellbeing of children, despite the gain of another adult to assistance with the task of parenting. As a number of studies have noted, outcomes for children in remarried families are more often than not little different from those of children in sole-parent families. Information technology is important to note also that remarriage generally results in an comeback in economic circumstances. As noted to a higher place, there appears to exist something associated with stepfamilies – perhaps the complexities of the new pattern of relationships that need to be established and worked at earlier the family unit can settle down into new comfy ways of living together – that weighs against both the economic gain and the gain of an additional developed effigy. In one case once again, this suggests that the absence of the father, by itself, does not play a strong role in explaining the differences betwixt children from divorced and intact families.

In that location are diverse reasons why the impact of the begetter's absence might be less than expected. Other adults may exist filling the gap by providing adult role models and back up to lone parents, and many fathers continue to make significant contributions to their children's wellbeing afterwards separation. It is not simply the father's presence in the home that is important; it is his presence in the child'south life.

Maternal Mental Health

Maternal mental health is another mechanism through which parental separation exerts effects on children's wellbeing. The pathways that connect separation, maternal mental health and child wellbeing are somewhat circuitous and are likely to operate via the route of impairments to parenting. The process of separation can take a toll on the mental health of separating parents, which can in turn impair the quality of parenting.

Cake et al. (1988) note that divorced mothers describe themselves in terms indicating low self-esteem and that a failed or failing marriage affects mothers more strongly than fathers. Hetherington et al. (1982, cited in Amato 1993) showed not merely that separation took a toll on the mental wellness of custodial mothers, in the grade of college rates of feet, depression, anger and self-uncertainty, just besides that this in plough impacted on their parenting, exemplified by less affectionate, less communicative, more punitive and more inconsistent disciplinary interactions with their children. Such sub-optimal parenting behaviours, in turn, have adverse consequences for children'due south wellbeing.

On the other hand, where custodial mothers are psychologically able to provide a loving, effective parent–child human relationship, children will be buffered from the stress divorce engenders and will tend to prosper developmentally (Kalter et al. 1989). Still, when economic deprivation, interparental hostility and the burdens of single parenting take their cost on the mental health of custodial mothers, children will tend to fare less well.

Interparental Disharmonize

The connection between marital separation and marital conflict is complex. Clearly the two factors are interrelated, in that at the fourth dimension of a marital dissolution the separating partners are probable to be at odds and many are involved in serious conflict. Hanson (1999) reported that nigh half of all couples who divorced exhibited high levels of disharmonize beforehand, compared with about one-quarter of families who remained continuously married.

However, the connection between marital separation and marital conflict is non at all straightforward, since some partners manage to carve up on relatively amicable terms, while many marriages survive for long periods despite the presence of ongoing conflict. Hanson (1999) constitute that approximately 75% of high-disharmonize couples chose not to divorce, indicating that, for the vast bulk of children exposed to high levels of parental conflict, divorce is not an avenue through which their exposure to conflict is reduced, at to the lowest degree in the curt term.

To understand the human relationship betwixt marital conflict and separation, it is important to distinguish betwixt conflict that precedes the separation and disharmonize that follows the separation. Many families experience disharmonize both before and after separation, and then it is non possible to describe a clear demarcation in this way. Nevertheless, in some cases a prolonged menses of disharmonize is terminated when parents separate, while in other cases the separation itself provokes a round of disharmonize which may persist for years afterward.

The prove near the affect of separation and pre-separation conflict is somewhat complex. First, both marital conflict and separation take been plant to be independently associated with kid outcomes. Peterson and Zill (1986) establish that marital conflict in intact homes, especially if persistent, was as harmful as separation. Indeed, they establish that scores on measures of overcontrolled and undercontrolled behaviour of children living among persistent conflict were even higher than for those living with 1 biological parent.

However, many studies take also reported the presence of an interaction between separation and disharmonize, so that in high-disharmonize families children benefit when their parents divorce, while in depression-conflict families children do worse when their parents divorce (Amato et al. 1995). Other studies prove similar results, although with a twist. Hanson (1999) found that children exposed to low levels of parental conflict appeared to suffer disadvantages when their parents separated, although he also institute that children exposed to loftier levels of parental conflict were neither better nor worse off, on average, when their parents divorced. Morrison and Coiro (1999) found that while their results did not indicate a benefit for children exiting loftier-disharmonize marriages (problem behaviours among children increased after separation regardless of the level of conflict that predated the separation), nevertheless the greatest increase in behaviour problems was observed among children whose parents remained married, despite very frequent quarrels.

All of these results indicate a complex relationship between marital disharmonize, separation and child outcomes. Taken together, they propose that children in high-conflict families are likely to be ameliorate off, while children in depression-conflict families are likely to be worse off, if their parents separate. Booth and Amato (2001) note that:

while escape from a high-disharmonize marriage benefits children considering it removes them from an aversive, stressful home environs, in contrast a divorce that is non preceded past a prolonged period of overt discord may represent an unexpected, unwelcome, and uncontrollable event, an outcome that children are likely to experience as stressful.

On the other hand, the testify about mail service-separation conflict is much more than straightforward. The more conflict in that location is, and the more this involves the children, the more than damaging it is to children'southward wellbeing.

Bream and Buchanan (2003) found that, amidst a sample of children whose parents could non agree on arrangements for them, loftier proportions had pregnant aligning bug: about half of both boys and girls immediately subsequently the proceedings, and around two-thirds of boys and one-third of girls a twelvemonth later. Children anile under vii were particularly vulnerable to such difficulties. Where half of such children were distressed at the fourth dimension of the outset interview, this had risen to 80% at the 2nd. This equates to four times the rate that would be expected in the general population. Indeed, the rate of difficulties amidst these children was similar to that among a sample of children who were subject to care proceedings.

Johnston et al. (1985) report that children who are the subject of lengthy post-separation disputes between their parents take been identified as the most at-risk among the divorcing population. For this group the major benefit of the divorce – the cessation of parental hostilities – does non accumulate. Johnston (1994) notes that children of high-conflict divorces scored as significantly more disturbed, and were two to four times more likely to have the kinds of aligning issues typically seen in children being treated for emotional and behavioural disturbance, when compared with national norms.

Conflict takes unlike forms and some types of conflict are especially dissentious for children. Hetherington (2003) found that parental conflict that is about the child or direct involves the kid, conflict that is physically violent, threatening or abusive, and disharmonize in which the kid feels caught in the middle between two warring parents have the most adverse consequences for children.

Even from this small pick of studies it seems articulate that post-separation conflict betwixt parents carries the risk of significant levels of adverse impacts on children.

Parenting and Parent–Child Relationships

Various studies have shown that separation and divorce pb to disruptions in parenting practices. Simons et al. (1999) found that the quality of the mother's parenting mediated much of the clan between divorce and child adjustment. In addition, the level of the begetter's involvement in parenting explained part of the association betwixt divorce and the externalising problems of boys. Compared with fathers in intact families, non-custodial fathers were less likely to provide their children with help in solving issues, to discuss standards of conduct or to enforce discipline. This reduced interest in parenting was associated with an increased probability that a boy would display comport problems. This suggests that a divorced father who remain actively involved as a parent may significantly reduce his son'southward chances of conduct issues. Indeed, Simons et al. (1999) note that boys with divorced parents, where both parents showroom competent parenting behaviours, are at no greater take a chance of involvement in delinquent behaviour than boys living in an intact family.

McLanahan and Bumpass (1994) investigated several hypotheses for the agin childbearing and marital outcomes of children of divorced parents and ended that parental function models and parental supervision were the major factors in determining the hereafter family unit-formation behaviour of offspring. As they notation, "it seems obvious that unmarried parents would have more difficulty maintaining authority and command over daughter's dating, which, in turn, is directly related to early family-formation behaviour".

Holdnack (1993) notes that parental divorce interrupts the emotional closeness between parents and children, leading to negative impacts on children'southward cocky-esteem. An unresolved effect is whether poor-quality family unit relationships arise as an effect of the divorce or whether these may accept pre-dated (and peradventure given rise to) the divorce. This raises the possibility that the results reflect selection into divorce rather than demonstrating the furnishings of divorce. Sunday (2001) found that, indeed, families on the verge of breakup are characterised past less intimate parent–parent and parent–child relationships, as well every bit less parental commitment to children's teaching and fewer economic resources. Prior to the marital disruption, families that broke down showed consequent signs of dysfunction on every indicator of family unit environment examined. Sunday (2001) concludes that this suggests that "a dysfunctional family environment serves as an important machinery by which marital disruption process affects children". However, it is as well possible that this reflects pick furnishings. I turn at present to an examination of such furnishings.

Selection Furnishings

The word so far has assumed that the associations between parental separation and child outcomes are brought well-nigh through causal connections that link the quondam to the latter. However, information technology is also possible that the associations arise through non-causal mechanisms; in particular, through pick furnishings. The give-and-take now turns to an test of such effects.

Several studies have demonstrated that many of the presumed effects of parental separation on children are axiomatic many years in accelerate of the actual separation. Cake et al. (1986) found the behaviour of boys as early on as xi years prior to parental separation to exist characterised by undercontrol of impulse, aggression, and excessive energy. Elliott and Richards (1991) report that children whose parents divorced when they were betwixt seven and 16 years old had worse scores on a range of measures of wellbeing than children whose parents remained married, not only at age 16 (after the separation) merely also at age vii.

A question that arises is whether these results reflect the fact that the procedure of parental separation can have identify over a long menstruum (while some families interruption down speedily, oft in spectacular ways with much rut, in other families the procedure is a longer and slower fire), or whether they upshot from selection furnishings (that is to say, some parents bring into a union a set of characteristics that are probable both to raise the possibility that the marriage will break downwards and to enhance the hazard of adverse outcomes for their children). There are a number of characteristics that might perform such a office, such as poor mental health, antisocial behaviour and substance dependencies. Parents with such personal difficulties are likely to take greater difficulties both in maintaining stable and enduring intimate relationships and in providing their children with a family environment that is likely to promote their wellbeing. Part of the patterns of association between parental separation and kid outcomes might therefore simply reflect the fact that some adults are not well equipped either to perform well as a matrimony partner or as a parent. Furstenberg and Teitler (1994) note that:

Families that eventually divorce may be different in a diverseness of ways from those that do not long before marital disruption occurs. They may be more likely to exhibit poor parenting practices, high levels of marital conflict, or endure from persistent economic stress ... exposure to these atmospheric condition may compromise children's economical, social and psychological wellbeing in after life whether or not a separation takes place.

Lord's day (2001) establish that, compared with parents that remain continuously married, parents who later divorce are more likely to have personal, sexual, psychological or financial problems throughout their wedlock, and these problems continue to affect children negatively. Given the persistence of these problems, a separation may really reduce the stress associated with such bug, resulting in relatively lilliputian farther damage to child wellbeing.

Emery et al. (1999) found that while children from never-married and divorced families had higher rates of externalising behaviour problems, much of this could exist explained by their mothers' histories of runaway behaviour in adolescence. In fact, runaway behaviour reported when hereafter mothers were single, childless adolescents prospectively predicted behaviour bug among their offspring 14 years later.

Thus, it appears that the contribution of divorce and its aftermath to children'due south problems in later life is not most as great as might exist inferred from findings that do not take adequate account of family weather prior to the separation. Parental separation does not occur randomly, and the causes that underlie it may as well exist part of the explanation for the credible impacts on children.

Genetic Transmission Mechanisms

1 means past which option furnishings might arise is via genetic transmission of characteristics and behaviours between parents and children. Studies of the touch of parental separation on children in adopted and biological families provide a window on this issue, since parents and children in biological families share both genes and environs, while parents and children in adoptive families share their environs but non their genes.

O'Connor et al. (2000) report some suggestive findings from such a study. They establish that, while biological and adopted children who had experienced a parental divorce displayed similarly elevated rates of behavioural problems and substance use compared with their peers in intact families, a different blueprint was establish for academic and social competence outcomes. While children from biological families also had lower levels of academic achievement and social competence than their peers in intact families, there were no differences between adopted children in divorced and intact families. They note that "the findings for psychopathology are consistent with an environmentally mediated caption for the clan between parents' divorce and children's adjustment [while] the findings for achievement and social adjustment are consistent with a genetically mediated explanation". These results prove that if genetic mechanisms are involved they accept differential effects in different spheres of development.

In a subsequent paper, O'Connor et al. (2003) reported that the clan between genetic risk (as reflected in a measure of negative reactivity in the biological parents) and kid adjustment amongst a sample of adopted children was chastened past parental separation. While genetic take a chance was uncorrelated with the adjustment of adopted children in intact families, amongst children who had experienced a parental divorce there were substantial and significant associations between genetic risk and poor adjustment. This effect indicates a complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors: genetic risk just poses a problem for children'south wellbeing in the presence of an environmental stressor such as parental divorce.

It appears, then, that genetic factors do play a role in the association betwixt parental separation and kid outcomes, although their impact varies across different event domains and interacts with environmental triggers.

An Exemplar Intervention: The New Beginnings Program

A large question raised by the above results for policy makers and their advisers is what, if anything, might be washed to convalesce the distress that parental separation causes in children's lives. While consideration of this question is beyond the scope of the present paper, it will be useful to sketch out the promising results that have been accomplished through one particular intervention, which indicates that there is indeed scope for effective activity.

The exemplar intervention I have called to highlight is the New Beginnings Plan in the United states, an intervention for custodial mothers following a separation, which was subject field to a true experimental trial (Wolchik et al. 2002). The programme involved randomised assignment to one of two handling conditions (a mother-only program, involving 11 group sessions with other custodial mothers, plus ii structured individual sessions and a dual component mother-plus-child program, which likewise included 11 group sessions for the children) or a command condition. Participants who were assigned to the command condition were issued with books on adjustment to divorce. The sample was randomly fatigued from divorce courtroom records. Children in the study were followed up six years after the intervention.

Wolchik et al. (2002) reported that both treatments were found to yield meaning benefits for the children who participated in them, compared with children in the control group. In detail, they exhibited reduced rates of mental disorders, reduced levels of externalising issues, reduced rates of substance abuse and reduced numbers of sexual partners. It appears, then, that it is possible to design interventions that afford children with significant protection from the adverse consequences of their parents' divorce, at the expense of a dozen or then sessions of group treatment for mothers.

Concluding Remarks

A number of conclusions can be fatigued from this brief survey of the literature on parental separation and kid outcomes. Outset, in that location is an abundance of evidence that children who experience a parental separation are, on average, worse off than their peers in intact families, on a number of measures of wellbeing. However, the scale of the differences in wellbeing between the two groups of children is not large and about children are not adversely afflicted. Parental separation then bears downwards most heavily on a minority of children, generally in the presence of other exacerbating factors.

Underlying these effects are multiple mechanisms: income declines following separation, declines in the mental health of custodial mothers, interparental conflict and compromised parenting. These mechanisms practice not operate independently, but are related in complex means. For instance, income declines post-obit separation identify mother-headed households at risk of textile and economical deprivation, which can take a price on mothers' mental health. This in turn can lead to compromised parenting behaviours. All of these factors tin affect adversely on child wellbeing.

Office of the effects also ascend from non-causal mechanisms: that is to say, not all of the adverse kid outcomes following separation tin exist laid at the door of the separation itself. Many of the difficulties have deeper roots that date from many years prior to the separation and are due to the fact that some parents bring into a union characteristics and behaviours – such equally poor mental health, antisocial behaviour or substance addictions – that are likely both to jeopardise the success of the marriage and heighten the risk of poor child outcomes. Furthermore, some of the associations between separation and child outcomes are due to genetic inheritance.

One factor that plays a more complex role is interparental conflict. Disharmonize betwixt parents plays a dual part, both as role of the caption for the link between parental separation and child outcomes and as an independent influence on child outcomes. Information technology is clear, nevertheless, that post-separation disharmonize which is bitter and ongoing and which places the children at the eye of disputation has highly malign effects on child wellbeing.

Yet this is a cistron which is surely amenable to treatment. If separating couples can be helped to reduce levels of disharmonize following a separation, or at least to empathise the importance of conducting their affairs out of the manner of the children and in ways that exercise not implicate them, then this is likely to accept meaning benefits for the wellbeing of the children. Every bit Moxnes (2003) notes, "extensive parental cooperation is ... the nigh important means by which to reduce the negative effects of divorce for children."

The prove from the evaluation of the New Beginnings Program shows that it is possible to design programmes aimed at ameliorating the negative fallout from a parental separation that yield real benefits for children, in terms of their mental health, behaviour and full general wellbeing. This suggests it would exist useful to carry farther investigations to identify promising approaches that afford children protection from a parental separation that could exist considered for trial in the New Zealand context.

References

Allison, Paul D. and Frank F. Furstenberg, Jr. (1989) "How marital dissolution affects children: Variations by age and sex" Developmental Psychology, 25(4):540-549.

Amato, Paul R. (1993) "Children'south adjustment to divorce: Theories, hypotheses, and empirical support" Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55:23-38.

Amato, Paul R. (1987) "Family processes in one-parent, stepparent, and intact families: The child's point of view" ā, 49(ii):327-337.

Amato, Paul R. and Danelle D. DeBoer (2001) "The transmission of marital instability across generations: Human relationship skills or commitment to marriage?" Journal of Spousal relationship and Family, 63:1038-1051.

Amato, Paul R. and Bruce Keith (1991) "Parental divorce and adult well-being: A meta-assay." Journal of Matrimony and the Family, 53(i):43-58.

Amato, Paul R., Laura Spencer Loomis and Alan Berth (1995) "Parental divorce, marital conflict, and offspring well-existence during early adulthood" Social Forces, 73(3):895-915.

Aquilino, William S. (1994) "Affect of childhood family disruption on young adults' relationships with parents" Journal of Matrimony and the Family, 56(2):295-313.

Aquilino, William S. (1996) "The life course of children built-in to unmarried mothers: Childhood living arrangements and young adult outcomes" Journal of Spousal relationship and the Family, 58:293-310.

Baydar, Nazli (1988) "Effects of parental separation and reentry into union on the emotional well-being of children" Periodical of Marriage and the Family, 50(four):967-981.

Biblarz, Timothy J. and Greg Gottainer (2000) "Family structure and children'due south success: A comparison of widowed and divorced single-mother families" Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(two):533-548.

Block, Jack, Jeanne H. Block and Per F. Gjerde (1988) "Parental functioning and the domicile environment in families of divorce: Prospective and concurrent analyses" Journal of the American Academy of Child and Boyish Psychiatry, 27(2):207-213.

Block, Jeanne H., Jack Block and Per F. Gjerde (1986) "The personality of children prior to divorce: A prospective study" Kid Evolution, 57:827-840.

Blum, Heather Monroe, Michael H. Boyle and David R. Offord (1988) "Single-parent families: Child psychiatric disorders and school performance" Periodical of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 27(2):214-219.

Booth, Alan and Paul R. Amato (2001) "Parental predivorce relations and offspring postdivorce well-being" Journal of Marriage and Family, 63:197-212.

Bream, Victoria and Ann Buchanan (2003) "Distress among children whose separated or divorced parents cannot agree arrangements for them" British Journal of Social Work, 33:227-238.

Burns, Ailsa, Rosemary Dunlop and Alan Taylor (1997) "Children and parental divorce: The meaning of minor furnishings" Australian Psychologist, 32(2):136-138.

Butler, Ian, Lesley Scanlan, Margaret Robinson, Gillian Douglas and Mervyn Murch (2002) "Children'due south involvement in their parents' divorce: Implications for practice" Children and Guild, 16:89-102.

Carlson, Marica J. and Mary E. Corcoran (2001) "Family unit structure and children's behavioral and cerebral outcomes" Periodical of Marriage and Family unit, 63:779-792.

Hunt-Lansdale, P. Lindsay, Andrew J. Cherlin and Kathleen E. Kiernan (1995) "The long-term effects of parental divorce on the mental health of immature adults: A developmental perspective" Child Development, 66:1614-1634.

Chase-Lansdale, P. Lindsay and Mavis E. Hetherington (1990) "The impact of divorce on life-span evolution: Brusk and long-term effects" in P. Baltes, D. Featherman and R. Lerner (eds.) Life Span Development and Behavior, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

Dawson, Deborah A. (1991) "Family structure and children'south health and well-beingness: Information from the 1988 National Health Interview Survey on Child Wellness" Journal of Matrimony and the Family, 53:573-584.

Demo, David H. and Alan C. Acock (1988) "The affect of divorce on children" Journal of Marriage and the Family unit, 50(3):619-648.Demo, David H. and Alan C. Acock (1996) "Family unit structure, family process, and boyish well-being" Journal of Research on Adolescence, six(4):457-488.

Dunn, Judy, Kirby Deater-Deckard, Kevin Pickering and Thomas Thousand. O'Connor (1998) "Children'due south adjustment and prosocial behaviour in step-, single-parent, and non-stepfamily settings: Findings from a community study" Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39(viii):1083-1095.

Elliott, Jane B. and Martin P.M. Richards (1991) "Children and divorce: Educational performance and behaviour earlier and later on parental separation" International Journal of Law and the Family, 5:258-276.

Ellis, B.J., J.East. Bates, M.A. Dodge, D.M. Fergusson, L.J. Horwood, Grand.S. Pettit and L.J. Woodward (2003) "Does begetter absence place daughters at special risk for early sexual practice and teenage pregnancy?" Kid Development, 74(3):801-821.

Emery, Robert Eastward., Yard. Waldron, Katherine M. Kitzman and J. Aaron (1999) "Delinquent behavior, future divorce or nonmarital childbearing, and externalizing behavior among offspring: A 14-year prospective study" Journal of Family Psychology, thirteen(4):568-79.

Ermisch, John F. and Marco Francesconi (2001) "Family structure and children's achievements" Journal of Population Economics, 14:249-270.

Evans, One thousand.D.R., Jonathan Kelley and Richard A. Wanner (2001) "Educational attainment of the children of divorce: Australia, 1940-90" Journal of Sociology, 37(3):275-297.

Fergusson, D.Yard., Thousand.Eastward. Dimond and Fifty.J. Horwood (1986) "Childhood family placement history and behaviour problems in 6-year-old children" Journal of Child Psychiatry, 27(ii):213-226.

Fergusson, David M., L. John Horwood and Michael T. Lynskey (1994) "Parental separation, adolescent psychopathology, and problem behaviors" Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 33(8):1122-1131.

Fergusson, David M., Michael T. Lynskey and L. John Horwood (1994) "The effects of parental separation, the timing of separation and gender on children's functioning on cerebral tests" Journal of Kid Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(six):1077-1092.

Fine, Mark A., Voydanoff, Patricia & Donnelly, Brenda W. (1993) "Relations betwixt parental control and warmth and kid well-being in stepfamilies" Journal of Family unit Psychology, seven(ii): 222-232.

Furstenberg, Frank Jr. and Julien O. Teitler (1994) "Reconsidering the effects of marital disruption: What happens to children of divorce in early adulthood?" Journal of Family unit Issues, 15(2):173-190.

Hanson, Thomas L. (1999) "Does parental conflict explicate why divorce is negatively associated with child welfare?" Social Forces, 77(4):1283-1315.

Hetherington, E. Mavis (2003) "Social support and the adjustment of children in divorced and remarried families" Babyhood, x(ii):217-236.

Hetherington, E. Mavis, Margaret Bridges and Glendessa Thousand. Insabella (1998) "What matters? What does not? Five perspectives on the association between marital transitions and children's adjustment" American Psychologist, 53(ii):167-184.

Hetherington, E. One thousand., M. Cox and R. Cox (1982) "Furnishings of divorce on parents and children" in One thousand. Lamb (ed.) Nontraditional Families, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

Holdnack, James A. (1993) "The long-term effects of parental divorce on family relationships and the furnishings on adult children's self-concept" in Craig A. Everett (ed.) Divorce and the Side by side Generation: Effects on Young Adults' Patterns of Intimacy and Expectations for Matrimony, Haworth Press, Binghamton, New York.

Jaffee, Sara R., Terrie E.Moffitt, Avshalom Caspi and Alan Taylor (2003) "Life with (or without) father: The benefits of living with two biological parents depend on the father's hating behavior" Kid Evolution, 74(1):109-126.

Jekielek, Susan Thousand. (1998) "Parental disharmonize, marital disruption and children's emotional well-being" Social Forces, 76(3):905-936.

Johnston, Janet R. (1994) "High-disharmonize divorce" The Futurity of Children, four(1):165-182.

Johnston, Janet R., Linda E.G. Campbell and Sharon South. Mayes (1985) "Latency children in postal service-separation and divorce disputes" Periodical of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 24(5):563-574.

Joshi, Heather, Elizabeth C. Cooksey, Richard D. Wiggins, Andrew McCullough, Georgia Verropoulou and Lynda Clarke (1999) "Diverse family living situations and child development: A multi-level analysis comparing longitudinal show from Uk and the U.s." International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family unit, xiii:292-314.

Kalter, Neil, Amy Kloner, Shelley Schreier and Katherine Okla (1989) "Predictors of Children's Postdivorce Aligning" American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59(4):605-618.

Keith, V.M. and B. Finlay (1988) "The impact of parental divorce on children'due south educational attainment, marital timing, and likelihood of divorce" Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50:797-809.

Kelly, Joan B. (1993) "Current enquiry on children's postdivorce adjustment: No simple answers" Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 31(one):29-49.

Kelly, Joan B. (2003) "Changing perspectives on children's adjustment following divorce: A view from the United States" Babyhood, 10(2):237-254.

Kurdek, Lawrence A., Mark A. Fine and Ronald J. Sinclair (1994) "The relation between parenting transitions and aligning in young adolescents: A multisample investigation" Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(4):412-432.

McLanahan, Sara S. and Karen Booth (1989) "Mother-only families: Problems, prospects, and politics" Journal of Union and the Family unit, 51(3):557-580.

McLanahan, Sara S. and Larry Bumpass (1994) "Intergenerational consequences of family disruption" American Journal of Folklore, 1:130-152.

Mitchell, Barbara A., Andrew V. Wister and Thomas K. Burch (1989) "The family environment and leaving the parental home" Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(three):605-613.

Morrison, Donna Ruane and Mary J. Coiro (1999) "Parental conflict and marital disruption: Practice children benefit when loftier-conflict marriages are dissolved?" Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61:626-637.

Moxnes, Kari (2003) "Run a risk factors in divorce: Perceptions by the children involved" Babyhood, 10(2):131-146.

Mueller, Charles W. and Hallowell Pope (1977) "Marital instability: A study of

its transmission betwixt generations" Journal of Wedlock and the Family,

39(1):83-93.O'Connor, Thomas K., Avshalom Caspi, John C. DeFries and Robert Plomin (2000) "Are associations between parental divorce and children'due south adjustment genetically mediated? An adoption written report" Developmental Psychology, 36(iv):429-437.

O'Connor, Thomas Chiliad., Avshalom Caspi, John C. DeFries and Robert Plomin (2003) "Genotype–environment interaction in children'due south adjustment to parental separation" Periodical of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(6):849-856.

O'Connor, Thomas G., Judy Dunn, Jennifer M. Jenkins, Kevin Pickering and Jon Rasbash (2001) "Family settings and children'south adjustment: Differential adjustment inside and across families" British Periodical of Psychiatry, 179:110-115.

Peterson, James L. and Nicholas Zill (1986) "Marital disruption, parent–kid relationships, and behavior problems in children" Journal of Spousal relationship and the Family, 48:295-307.

Pryor, Jan and Rodgers, Bryan (2001) Children in Changing Families: Life Subsequently Parental Separation, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.

Ross, Catherine E. and John Mirowsky (1999) "Parental divorce, life-course disruption, and adult low" Journal of Wedlock and the Family, 61:1034-1045.

Simons, Ronald L., Kuei-Hsiu Lin, Leslie C. Gordon, Rand D. Conger and Frederick O. Lorenz (1999) "Explaining the higher incidence of adjustment bug among children of divorce compared with those in ii-parent families" Journal of Matrimony and the Family, 61:1020-1033.

Sun, Yongmin (2001) "Family environment and adolescents' well-existence before and afterward parents' marital disruption: A longitudinal analysis" Journal of Marriage and Family, 63:693-713.

Teachman, Jay D. (2002) "Childhood living arrangements and the intergenerational transmission of divorce" Journal of Marriage and Family unit, 64:717-729.

Tucker, Joan Southward., Howard Southward. Friedman, Joseph E. Schwartz, Michael H. Criqui, Carol Tomlinson-Keasey, Deborah L. Wingard and Leslie R. Martin (1997) "Parental divorce: Effects on private behavior and longevity" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2):381-391.

Videon, Tami Chiliad. (2002) "The effects of parent-boyish relationships and parental separation on boyish well-being" Journal of Marriage and Family unit, 64:489-503.

Wallerstein, Judith S. and Shauna B. Corbin (1989) "Daughters of divorce: Written report from a ten-twelvemonth follow-up" American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 59(iv):593-604.

Wolchik, Sharlene A., Irwin Northward. Sandler, Roger E. Millsap, Brett A. Plummer, Shannon M. Greene, Edward R. Anderson, Spring R. Dawson-McClure, Kathleen Hipke and Rachel A. Haine (2002) "Six-twelvemonth follow-up of preventive interventions for children of divorce" Periodical of the American Medical Clan, 288(15):1874-1881.

Woodward, Lianne, David Chiliad. Fergusson and Fifty. John Horwood (2001) "Risk factors and life processes associated with teenage pregnancy: Results of a prospective study from nascence to 20 years" Journal of Spousal relationship and Family, 63:1170-1184.

Wu, Lawrence L. (1996) "Effects of family instability, income, and income instability on the chance of a premarital nativity" American Sociological Review, 61:386-406.

ⁱ Much of the enquiry literature on stepfamilies focuses on stepfather families, because, following a separation, well-nigh children live with their female parent

Source: https://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/journals-and-magazines/social-policy-journal/spj24/24-impact-of-family-structure-and-family-change-on-child-outcome-p111-133.html

Posted by: lujancoldingaze.blogspot.com